<\/p>\n
\u963f\u8fea\u00b7\u4f0a\u683c\u7d0d\u4fee\u65af\uff1a\u6211\u662f\u963f\u8fea\u00b7\u4f0a\u683c\u7d0d\u4fee\u65af\u3002<\/p>\n
\u827e\u8389\u68ee\u2027\u6bd4\u723e\u5fb7\uff1a\u6211\u662f\u827e\u8389\u68ee\u2027\u6bd4\u723e\u5fb7\uff0c\u9019\u662f\u300a\u54c8\u4f5b\u5546\u696d\u8a55\u8ad6\u300b IdeaCast\u3002<\/em><\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: All right, Alison, so you are a top 30 U.S. company in terms of size, but your market share is down, your share price has plummeted and morale is poor. You need to change. What kind of CEO would you want to lead the transformation?<\/p>\n ALISON BEARD: Well, I would typically say an outsider for fresh perspectives, new thinking. I\u2019d probably want someone who\u2019s done a big turnaround at another company before. But I did just interview John Stankey of AT&T who oversaw big changes at that company even as an insider. So I\u2019m not sure.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: All right. So today it is the outsider story and it\u2019s in the same industry. My guest today is Dan Schulman, the man who has taken the reins of Verizon, which was in desperate need of a reset. He was not an exec of the company, though he was on the board, and he had led a successful turnaround earlier at PayPal, but he had no interest in the Verizon job when it was first offered to him.<\/p>\n ALISON BEARD: So how\u2019s it going?<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Well, it\u2019s still early days, but Schulman decided to focus initially on the company\u2019s culture. He\u2019s trying to reinvigorate what had become a risk averse, inward-looking organization in order to become competitive again. It has the potential to be a case study of how an outsider can come in to lead the turnaround of a once successful company that has lost its way. Here\u2019s the conversation.<\/p>\n You\u2019re at Verizon. You turned down the job, as I understand it, twice, maybe more than twice before you agreed to take it. What made you want to get back in the game?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, I turned it down because I was very happily retired. I was living on our ranch in Montana. I wasn\u2019t looking to come back into corporate life. But I was on the board; I was the lead director, we needed to make a change. I felt a keen sense of loyalty to the company, and I felt like the company had a tremendous amount of assets that we could leverage and that there was a real opportunity to take an iconic American company and at least have the shot at turning it around. And so after a lot of discussions with my wife, I agreed reluctantly to go do it, but here I am nine months into the job and I\u2019m loving it.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: At a high level, what was wrong with the company?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: We had been losing market share for five years. We went from having the largest market gap in the industry to having the lowest P\/E multiple, which is the market\u2019s way of saying that they don\u2019t really believe in your growth going forward. Our churn rates were going up, our customer satisfaction results were going down. So there\u2019s just a ton of things. And I think inside the company, really importantly, we were willing to be prey. We were willing to gently seed market share to our competitors. We weren\u2019t playing to win. it was obvious we needed to make a change.<\/p>\n The company for a long time had relied on its engineering prowess and it\u2019s not enough anymore. And we had put the network at the center of everything that we do, as opposed to the customer. And then I also think culturally, it\u2019s a proud company. It has a lot to be proud of, but that also means that you\u2019re resistant to change. That you look back at what you did and you want to repeat it. And in the era that we live in right now where change is accelerating at an increasingly hard to imagine pace, we were falling behind.<\/p>\n When the pace of change external to a company is faster than the change of pace internal, you\u2019re falling behind. And we were falling behind because we were risk averse. We were hierarchical. We love our process. We love to show our work, but really I\u2019m very much, I trust that you\u2019re doing good work, but I want to see the outcomes and I want to know when those outcomes are coming. I think we\u2019re not imagining enough what kind of role can we play in the age of technology, in the age of AI, and looking backwards to previous success we had as opposed to what success we might have in the future.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So companies talk all the time about wanting to be customer obsessed. For Verizon in particular, which probably a lot of customers view as a utility, they just want it to work. They\u2019re not sure they want a relationship with you, but they want it to work. What does customer obsession mean for you in this context?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Yeah. I think most people say that they want to put the customer front and center, but it\u2019s not easy to go and do that. Inside the company right now, we don\u2019t say customer centricity or customer obsessed. The initiative we have inside the company is entitled: every customer has a name. It means we treat you as a person, not as an account, not as a line. Almost like if one of my family members had a problem, how would I want the company to treat them? And that is hundreds of things. It\u2019s when you come into the store, how quickly do we start to serve you? Do you understand the plans that we have in front of you? Are they too complex for you to understand?<\/p>\n Are we trying to prey on complexity to drive profitability or can we mak e them simple and easy to understand? When you call our customer service centers, do we treat you with respect and empathy? Customers fire companies all the time in quiet ways because they feel disrespected. They feel like there\u2019s got to be a better way than this. It\u2019s too hard to be a part of your company. We have to have a great network. I want us to have the best network in the country. We are part of the critical infrastructure for America and we take that very, very seriously. But it\u2019s not enough to be fully differentiated.<\/p>\n We just launched a whole host of new things where we\u2019ve simplified our pricing plans. We\u2019ve put loyalty. So if you\u2019ve been a customer for a long time, we want to reward you for that. We want you to be excited about being a customer every day. We\u2019re moving into an AI world right now and our service is going to be more important than ever, in terms of connectivity, AI advancements, how you use AI, what\u2019s the right way for you to use AI, how you gin up agents in a safe way. We can be a part of that new infrastructure going forward. And that\u2019s an exciting part and a different way of thinking about Verizon going forward in a place where I think we can add a lot more value to customers around security, other things like that.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Are you essentially accepting lower revenue temporarily to build longer term loyalty? Is that what that means with simplified plans that give people only what they want and need?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: No, I don\u2019t think that being customer-centric means being less than fiscally responsible back to your shareholders. In fact, I think it can be the opposite. What was happening to us before was our churn rate was going up because people were unhappy with us. We were raising prices. We weren\u2019t treating them with the respect they wanted. Plans were confusing to them. The first thing I did when I came in is I said, \u201cWe\u2019re not going to raise prices without real value. And we\u2019re going to invest in the customer experience. And we\u2019re going to create a war chest to go and do that. And we\u2019re going to start growing our customers.\u201d Because if you start to grow your customers because churn starts to come down, then actually your revenues start to increase. And if you can be efficient in the way that you do business, your top and bottom line and your customer satisfaction can all move in the same direction.<\/p>\n Now that\u2019s not an easy equation to go and do. And you have to be willing to take difficult decisions early on to make that happen. I think if you do the right things, make the difficult decisions, challenge the culture, inspire people to do great things, that you can satisfy customers, you can inspire employees and you can inspire your shareholders at the same time.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So it\u2019s never easy to come in. I mean, you were on the board, but you essentially came in as an outsider. And even though you\u2019ve had a great track record at PayPal and elsewhere, people are resistant to change. It\u2019s never you just come in and say, \u201cWe\u2019re going to do this,\u201d and everybody says, \u201cHooray.\u201d Talk about the bumps along the way to get the team, the staff, the company excited in these ideas or willing to explore these ideas.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, first of all, you\u2019re exactly right. People are resistant to change, and change is happening at an accelerating rate right now. People who win the lottery, which you have to admit is a good change, right? You\u2019ve just won the lottery, often suffer divorces, lose friends because it\u2019s such a big change in their life.<\/p>\n I think as a leader, you need to do three things simultaneously and you need to do them particularly well. The first thing is you need to tell it like it is without sugarcoating it at all. My view is every employee is an adult. They probably already know what\u2019s going on. They\u2019re just waiting for leadership to admit it. My first all-employee meeting, actually every single all-employee meeting, I have no slides. I have no notes.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: I want to come to those meetings.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Yeah, they\u2019re good. Yeah. I have a cup of coffee in my hand and I basically just talk from the heart, just like this is what I see. And I said, \u201cLook, I know we have a lot to be proud of as a company, but the fact of the matter is we are losing. And I know that\u2019s actually really hard to hear that we\u2019re losing. And that just does not work for me. I know it does not work for you either, but we need to play to win. We need a full scale internal kind of revolution and cultural re-shift where we play to win.\u201d And that\u2019s not a marketing slogan, that\u2019s a way of life inside the company. And I talked about what\u2019s getting in the way of that, what\u2019s happening in our culture to get away from that. On a scale from 1 to 10, this company is traditionally a 2 in terms of being risk averse.<\/p>\n I\u2019m a one when it comes to the integrity of our financial results, cybersecurity. I have no tolerance for any risk in that. But trying new things, failing, learning from them, moving forward, I\u2019m probably an 8 or a 9. The company just needs to feel like it can take risks, that it can fail, that it\u2019s okay to go do that. We\u2019re going to learn from it. Everybody wants to play for a winning team. Nobody wants to be on a losing team. So that\u2019s the first thing you need to do.<\/p>\n We also need to invest in the customer. We need money to go and do that. I talked about the need to create that war chest, and that was going to result in layoffs. I made the hard decision and it was my decision. I worked with my team on it, but I take the responsibility for it. We laid off 13,000 people in month two. And I was in front of the whole company talking about that, saying that laying off even one person, one person, because it affects their family, their friends, colleagues who have worked for them is painful. But our job is to make sure that we are as efficient as we can be, that we create this war chest.<\/p>\n And I said, \u201cWe\u2019re going to do this layoff, but we\u2019re going to take most of those dollars.\u201d And we talked about $5 billion of OpEx savings we\u2019re going to do and invest it back in the customer so that we could be a great company going forward, so that we could reclaim our market leadership, become the most trusted company in our industry. And when we started going through that, that would feel great. That it would feel difficult and disruptive at first. But I\u2019m playing for what are we trying to accomplish? What is our vision going forward? Because people need to be inspired as well.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So what are your employees thinking about? What is it that\u2019s motivating them? What\u2019s the goal? What are they trying to get to?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: I think what they are really motivated about right now is that we are playing to win. That we are trying to be a trusted company, and that they see that we can do that. Early successes are really important in these things because once people start to see success happening, they really rally around that. The first quarter, I came in October, we had been losing subscribers for a long time. We put on something like 650,000 subscribers that first quarter because I was like, \u201cWe are going to play to win. We\u2019re going to do what we need to go do. We\u2019ll be fiscally responsible, but we\u2019re going to win.\u201d And our stock went up that day by the most it had gone up in 18 years.<\/p>\n Winning is contagious. You have to see that. And I think people also, they were yearning to play for a winning team. Nobody wants to be in a bureaucratic organization. Nobody wants to be in a hierarchical organization. They want to have permission to be their best selves going forward. And we also push them hard. One of my sayings is that every single day matters here. I want to see improvement every single day. And there\u2019s an intensity about that. There\u2019s a saying, heaven and hell are the same place. It\u2019s just heaven for some and hell for others. And for me, working hard, being disruptive in the market, putting customers at the center, being on a winning team, being available anytime to go make these decisions, to me, that\u2019s like heaven. I love that.<\/p>\n Some people don\u2019t like that, and that\u2019s okay as well. We are not the company for that right now. And so I think we\u2019re getting the people who are now inspired to be here, who want to make us better, and better, and better. And we have not just kind of defined what reality is and created the vision of where we want to go to, but we have a roadmap on exactly how we\u2019re going to get there. And I think everybody understands that they\u2019re bought in. We have a ton to execute against still, obviously, Adi, but we\u2019re making good progress. I\u2019m really proud of the team.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: You talked about trying to be a truth teller and you\u2019ve cultivated a reputation about being a truth teller about AI. What is the truth about AI in business?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Truth is a subjective thing often. It\u2019s your set of circumstances, how you see things, and I may see them differently. So I don\u2019t think there\u2019s any absolutes in that. And especially when you\u2019re thinking about the future. What I do try to be is as authentic and honest about how I see the future playing out. AI is going to be a part of our future. And you will be better at your job and you will be better in life if you understand how to use and capture the benefits of AI. So we\u2019ve put in place gigantic training programs, full week-long training programs on using AI for all employees.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve also put into place extensive kind of re-skilling programs for employees who might be affected by AI going forward. In other words, they\u2019re displaced by AI. I want to make sure that they have all of the tool sets and access to be successful in whatever their next chapter might be. But I don\u2019t think we should underestimate the impact of AI. And I want to be as honest about that as I possibly can.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Obviously, we don\u2019t know the future, but maybe what are some of the early use cases that tell you, yeah, we could accelerate here, here, here and be a very different company?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, first of all, I think the value that we offer to consumers is going to be radically shaped by AI. I don\u2019t think we\u2019ll just be a connectivity company going forward, offering wireless and broadband. I think we\u2019ll be a integral part of how consumers use AI. I think we can put a AI fabric over our network. I think we can do things that enable consumers and small businesses to take full advantage of AI in their lives.<\/p>\n That could be things like token packages where people buy tokens from us and we\u2019re an orchestration layer on top of the network where we cost optimize the use of those tokens for you. Because as a consumer, there\u2019s certain LLMs that are good for certain jobs, but they may cost more. But you as a consumer may not know that, but we as a network will know that. And so we could cost optimize the use of tokens. And I think that tokens are going to be the coin of the realm.<\/p>\n We could offer a safe place in our network because we have 95 million people in the country that use us, where if you want to utilize an agent, you can utilize it in the context of our network. We could provide that secure environment. What we offer going forward could be very different than what we offer today on top of the connectivity.<\/p>\n We\u2019ll also be a part of the AI infrastructure in the company. We\u2019ll connect these data centers through dark fiber and lit fiber. We have the capability by retrofitting all of our central offices into edge computing data centers to take inference out to the edge for applications that need low latency like remote surgery or autonomous driving vehicles.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a radically different value proposition that adds much more richness to the depth of the relationship that we have with consumers and businesses. I think AI will enable us to be way more productive. We\u2019ll get more things done, but also really importantly, increase our customer satisfaction levels dramatically.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So what\u2019s the plausible darker scenario? I mean, I feel like tech CEOs all the time are saying things that alarm us about, \u201cWe have 500 days until AI will\u2026\u201d Something bad sounds like it\u2019s coming. And obviously job losses are a certainty. Whether net job losses are\u2026 I don\u2019t know. But what\u2019s the plausible dark side and how do you think about that? How do you lead with that?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: If you think about the speed that AI is developing, there are going to be all sorts of considerations to think about. I mean, three years ago when these models first came out, they were great, but they couldn\u2019t even do math, right? Remember? They-<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Yeah.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: \u2026 couldn\u2019t really multiply. tTe models that we\u2019re using today are the worst models that we will ever use. OpenAI is going to put out four iterations of their model between now and the end of the year. Every one of them will be substantially better. We are on the cusp of what\u2019s called recursive self-learning for these models, which basically means that the models will write themselves, no human intervention. We\u2019re probably 6 to 12 months from that.<\/p>\n You\u2019ve got Quantum coming. We\u2019re preparing for Quantum that it comes by 2028. And the way that I think about Quantum is everything times 1,000. And then several years later, you\u2019ve got humanoid robotics behind that. So obviously there are a lot of things that are going to change in our world. I think there is no question in my mind that there is going to be disruption; we don\u2019t know exactly what that\u2019s going to look like \u2019cause it\u2019s the future.<\/p>\n But the way that I think about life in general and the way that I think about things is it\u2019s scenario planning. Like, \u201cOkay, we don\u2019t know exactly, but let\u2019s scenario plan. What could happen?\u201d As I look function by function, I can see disruption in various functions. And the question really is, how do we get ready for that? How do we provide the right re-skilling, the right training? When I did this initial layoff, we put in place a $20 million fund. We\u2019re the first company to go and do that for AI re-skilling and training. I actually don\u2019t think that\u2019s enough, going forward. I think we\u2019re going to double, maybe triple that amount over the next one to two years to make sure that not only are all employees inside Verizon prepared for a future, however that future may play out, but also the communities that we serve. We\u2019ll go into various cities, various small businesses that may not be experts at how to use agentic forms of AI going forward, and help them with that.<\/p>\n Because I think as leaders, we have a responsibility to go and do that. If there\u2019s going to be a two to five-year trough where there\u2019s potentially more unemployment, that\u2019s not good for our economy. That\u2019s not good for our country. That\u2019s not good for any of our companies. And so I think all of us who have positions of responsibility, we all need to step up. And I think we can do our part, and will do our part.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So I want to talk about leadership at a high altitude. You come into a CEO role. It\u2019s different from your first many, many years ago. What did you learn in terms of, \u201cCEO needs to do this, does not need to do this\u201d? What was the wisdom that you accumulated?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, you\u2019re right. There\u2019s no substitute for a lot of years of experience \u2019cause you go through a lot. You go through ups and downs. What I tell people here, I think, for a leader is, one, you need to be humble. And what I mean by humble is you don\u2019t know it all. And if you do think you\u2019re the smartest person in the room, you\u2019re just in the wrong room. Get out there. There\u2019s too much going on. I mean, it\u2019s just changing so rapidly. We need to be learning all the time. And that means that things that we thought were certain before are probably no longer certain. You need to challenge yourself continually. I have this saying that I never want to stand still, because when you do, you start falling way behind on it.<\/p>\n I also think, being authentic, there\u2019s a superpower in that. I never want to talk in corporate speak. I just want to be me, because it\u2019s the easiest thing that I can be. And people see that. It\u2019s approachable. They know that they can talk to me about anything. They know I\u2019m going to be as truthful as I can be about where we\u2019re going. And I\u2019m also very honest to say, \u201cI don\u2019t know what that future is going to be.\u201d And I think people really respect that. I think we need to inspire. And I think we need to admit when we\u2019re wrong and course correct.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So that can\u2019t be enough, though, to be humble. I mean, there are a lot of humble, authentic people out there.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Not that many. But-<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Well, okay. I mean, no, I agree, those are great attributes, but there are probably a lot of humble, authentic guys out there. The ability to inspire, I get. But there\u2019s got to be more than just, \u201cI\u2019m just like this at home. What you see is what you get.\u201d I mean, there have to be other skills, attributes, approaches that are key to doing this job successfully.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, I mean, they\u2019re the basics. You\u2019ve got to be able to work at a very intense level. You have to have extremely high expectations, and insist upon them. You need to be able to make very difficult decisions and stand up to them. People need to know that you\u2019re going to lead, you\u2019re going to be uncompromising, that you have an expectation that you\u2019re going to win. I\u2019m a fighter. I\u2019ve done mixed martial arts for like 40 years.<\/p>\n And I\u2019ve learned from that to be very cool, calm, collected in very high stress situations. I feel like as a leader, you can never be too up or too down either, because good things are going to happen, that\u2019s great, but they\u2019re going to be followed by difficult things and that\u2019s also okay. You\u2019ll learn from those. I think those are just from my perspective, the basics of leadership. And then I do think those traits on top of those are really important, being humble, being authentic, and being willing to say the same thing that you say internally, publicly. It\u2019s great because you don\u2019t really have to think that much about-<\/p>\n \u963f\u8fea\u00b7\u4f0a\u683c\u5167\u4fee\u65af\uff1a<\/p>\n You got to get your story straight.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN:<\/p>\n Exactly. What did I say every year or what did I say every year? It\u2019s very consistent.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So, for Verizon, this is a turnaround. You\u2019ve used that term.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Yeah.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: When does it end?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: You\u2019d expect me to say this, probably never ends, but that\u2019s not really your question. So, in my view, there\u2019s a three-year plan that we\u2019re under right now. The first year is about admitting the issues that we have, confronting them head on, putting into place a fully comprehensive transformation program. We have 10 work streams. We have 400 initiatives in them. Everyone in the company is engaged in those. I meet every single week on those. I spend hours on every single one of the 10 work streams. We have the leaders of the company involved in all of them. Year two is institutionalizing that. We\u2019re making that transformation right now. Let\u2019s see the results, course correct, solidify. And then year three, we turn into an AI native company. We are part of the AI infrastructure and we\u2019ve transformed who we are as a company.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: So, I guess another way of saying it, what would have to be true for people to say Dan Schulman fundamentally changed Verizon?<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Well, I think you\u2019ll see it in all of our metrics. You\u2019ll see it in our customer satisfaction results. You\u2019ll see it in our churn rate. You\u2019ll see it in our employee satisfaction results. You\u2019ll see it that we are truly AI native. I think to become AI native, the technology is going to be there. There\u2019s no question about it. I mean, I think in two years time, we\u2019re approaching AGI, if not at AGI, two or three years. We\u2019re at quantum by 2030 at the latest.<\/p>\n So, I think the technology will be there. I think the most successful companies will have figured out culturally how to adopt to that. I think that is probably the biggest challenge for any company because people can be scared of all of the change. They can be scared of what could AI do to my job, that kind of thing.<\/p>\n And so, I think the issue that we will all face is how do we adopt it. And I think again there, in our network teams, when they see what we can do in terms of improving the network by running these things autonomously. When we look at our cyber security and we see how much better we can be than we\u2019ve been in the past. And by the way, I think we\u2019ve been amazing in the past, but we\u2019re living in the time of AI. It\u2019s not good enough for how we\u2019ve been. There\u2019s a lot to be very excited about on the AI front. People talk about is there going to be disruption. There is going to be disruption, but we\u2019ve had a lot of disruption in our lives and humans are amazingly adept at moving through it.<\/p>\n People always have tragedy in their life. Somehow they bounce back from that. And I feel like the utilization of AI, how AI native we are as a company, how we\u2019ve been able to adapt it, and what that\u2019s done for all of the constituencies that I serve will be the legacy that I hope to leave.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: Dan, this is a great conversation. Thank you for your time.<\/p>\n DAN SCHULMAN: Yeah, Adi, thank you so much. I appreciate it.<\/p>\n ADI IGNATIUS: That was Dan Schulman, the CEO of Verizon.<\/p>\n Next week, Alison looks at how organizations can create products and services to appeal to both emerging and developing markets.<\/p>\n