The talents and skills that have gotten you near the top won’t necessarily take you への the top.

トピックス
未来志向のリーダーのためのコーチング
取締役兼CEOコーチであり、アドバイザー、そして作家でもあるサンイン・シアンが、トップ・マネジャー向けのアドバイス・コラムをお届けする。
このシリーズをもっと見る

Carolyn Geason-Beissel/MIT SMR|Getty Images
Rising leaders often emphasize the skills and abilities that have won them promotions throughout their careers, such as a deep knowledge of their organization and an ability to respond quickly and comprehensively to top leaders’ questions. But showing off those capabilities may not help a candidate for a top job move up, suggests MIT SMR columnist Sanyin Siang. She advises rising leaders aiming for the next level to take an intentional approach to showcasing their strategic thinking.
I’ve been trying to move up to the next level and want to be considered a candidate for senior leadership roles. I think I’m well liked, and I understand the company and our business deeply and care about the future of the organization. But recently I received feedback that I’m “not enough of a visionary leader.” What am I missing?
In most cases, leaders who receive this feedback do have a vision. When someone has decades of industry experience and extensive organizational knowledge, the problem is rarely a lack of strategic thinking. Rather, it is typically a lack of visible strategic signaling. You may be thinking like a visionary, but you are not showing it.
Boards and promotion committees are not mind readers. They might not have worked closely enough with you to understand the way you think, and they can’t evaluate your future potential based on what’s in your head. They can only evaluate you based on what you consistently project in meetings, interviews, and conversations.
Many high performers excel at answering interviewers’ questions with precision. They skillfully showcase their operational competence and deep knowledge — often the strengths on which they’ve built their success and that have won them promotions. But being seen as a visionary requires demonstrating a different set of strengths. Your priority in these interactions should be to show that you have a hypothesis about the future of your industry and your company’s place within that future, and that you are actively digging into data and trends to test that hypothesis.
A straightforward question often contains much that is unsaid, and your response can be framed to include strategic insights. A board member who asks about market share in the Midwest is also implicitly asking, “Why does this region matter? How does it fit into our long-term strategy? Who are our competitors, and what can we do to win?”
A visionary response might be something like this: “I think you’re asking because the Midwest has become a growth engine for us, especially in Kansas and Missouri. Our market share is currently 20%, but what is more important is that our top competitors are currently at 28% and 31%. They’re winning through faster distribution and their e-commerce presence.

